Practices of Re-Appropriation and “Liberation” of Urban Commons. The Case of Naples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v11i3.491Abstract
For decades, commons and related management practices have been at the center of a broader academic, political and public debate. There have been many attempts to recognize, categorize and analyse this type of goods, that are, by definition, other than State and Market. In the urban context, there are many experiences that show how the citizens, in order to reclaim abandoned and/or disused public spaces and places, act informal practices as a response to collective requests that try to resist and contain processes of commodification of space (Lefebvre, 1976). Starting from these reflections, the article engages with the debate on the practices of re-appropriation of urban commons put into action by the local community. Preferring an ethnographic research approach, the article presents the results of a case study concerned the building of Santa Maria della Fede “Liberata”. An abandoned public building, located in the historic area of Naples, at the center of a commoning and liberation process.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
(APC) Article and submissions processing charges
ISR does not ask for articles and submissions processing charges APC
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following points:
- Authors retain the rights to their work and give to the journal the right of first publication of the work, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License. This attribution allows others to share the work, indicating the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors may enter into other agreements with non-exclusive license to distribute the published version of the work (eg. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
- Authors can distribute their work online (eg. on their website) only after the article is published (See The Effect of Open Access).